I work with Mac people all the time, but we wind up using my machines when we want to get the project done. Wherever time and money doesn't matter, you'll find a lot of Macs. Macs get expensive quickly as your needs increase from basic to advanced and those decisions have to be made up front, or you have to replace the machine.īut it is true that apple has made in-roads in the industry. As things get more complicated, compute, ram and storage requirements go up quickly, and suddenly a cheap, non upgradeable laptop is a bottleneck. Depends on complexity.Ĭomputationally, video editing is a fairly low-end activity. There are equivalent or cheaper options that will edit video just as well on the PC side. definitely go Linux and tell Apple and MS to screw off.Īgain, no. Macs are a blessing and a curse in this way.īetter yet, if Linux happens to have all the software you intend to use and supports the hardware you intend to buy. Though rare, once in a while they're even competitive on price. There's no low end or high end (relative to the big picture of computing options), but if you put up the money you'll probably get something that performs reasonably well for many things. The Mac ecosystem is a direct road to moderate performance.and bad choices lead to the very real reality that. As with all things in the Windows world, choice is king. There are Windows-based laptop options that will perform exceptionally well in video editing tasks and there are Windows-based laptop options that will not perform well.so performance questions are situational. That's fantastic, but that's not where I need the performance. and yet an M1 iMac will run the basic functionality of Photoshop just as well if not better. For example, there is no Mac that can be built that will compete with a Windows box for the work I do, period. The hardware you use has specs, and those specs, in coordination with programming, determine performance for each kind of task. There is no single measure that defines "performance".There are elements of truth in what you are saying Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Here are some alternative FOSS and closed-source NLEs that are actually free to use: r/videography does not remove posts discussing this software, however we do advise our users to consider an alternative. Some 'royalty free' stock music assets included with Filmora have also resulted in users recieving copyright claims on YouTube.įilmora 'lifetime' licenses are only valid for the operating system you license the software on, so if you even swap operating systems, you will need to buy another license. Recently they have begun using YouTube integrations with scripts that advertise the software as 'Free to Download' but still failing to mention that exports are watermarked. They also use deceptive marketing techniques such as posting adverts disguised as 'tutorials' for competing software, and offering a 'free' version of their software that does not clearly disclose the fact that any exported file will be watermarked. Wondershare are violators of the GPL and use code from open-source projects without adhering to the correct licenses. The /r/videography moderators do not recommend using Wondershare Filmora. u/shickey maintains a videography-themed weekly challenge subreddit, so if you're looking for something to shoot head on over to /r/DoCreativeĬamera, NLE, year started, general location
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |